Drug safety and Pharmacovigilance

May 11, 2023

Drug safety and pharmacovigilance are related fields in the domain of healthcare, particularly concerning the monitoring and assessment of the safety of drugs. While they share common goals and overlap to some extent, there are subtle differences between the two terms:

Drug Safety:

Drug safety refers to the overall concept of ensuring that medicines are safe for use by patients. It encompasses all activities involved in the evaluation, detection, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems. Drug safety is concerned with the entire lifecycle of a drug, from its preclinical development to post-marketing use.

Key aspects of drug safety include:

  • Preclinical Safety Assessment: Conducting laboratory experiments and animal studies to assess the safety profile of a drug candidate before it enters human trials.
  • Clinical Trials: Conducting well-controlled studies on human volunteers to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the drug.
  • Adverse Event Reporting: Collecting and analyzing reports of adverse events or side effects associated with a drug's use.
  • Risk Management: Developing strategies to minimize the risks associated with drug use and ensuring that the benefits outweigh the potential harm.
  • Regulatory Oversight: Collaborating with regulatory authorities to review safety data and make informed decisions regarding the approval, labeling, and post-approval surveillance of drugs.

Pharmacovigilance:

Pharmacovigilance specifically focuses on the science and activities related to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems. It primarily deals with the systematic collection, analysis, and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring in real-world clinical practice. It focuses on postmarket stage of the drug development.

Key aspects of pharmacovigilance include:

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring: Collecting and analyzing reports of adverse drug reactions from healthcare professionals, patients, and other sources.
  • Signal Detection: Identifying potential safety concerns or signals from the collected data that warrant further investigation.
  • Risk Assessment: Evaluating the severity and likelihood of adverse events and assessing the risk-benefit balance of a drug.
  • Benefit-Risk Management: Implementing measures to optimize the safe and effective use of drugs based on risk assessments.
  • Regulatory Reporting: Compiling and submitting periodic safety update reports to regulatory authorities as part of post-marketing surveillance requirements.

In essence, drug safety encompasses a broader perspective, including both preclinical and clinical phases, while pharmacovigilance primarily focuses on post-marketing surveillance and monitoring of drug safety. Pharmacovigilance acts as a critical component of the broader field of drug safety, contributing to the ongoing evaluation and management of drug risks and benefits to ensure patient safety.

Ready to leave clinical medicine but don't know where to start?

Download the Nonclinical career transition guide!

We hate SPAM. We will never sell your information, for any reason.

Sudha Bakhshi

For me, Jawaria has been a game changer in seeking non-clinical employment. I’ve been working with her for a period of time that was divided into a number of phases.

This first part was to undergo an inventory of professional traits to better understand my strengths and weaknesses. In general I am skeptical of organizational personality assessments and feel that they tend to overgeneralize and group people based on superficial assumptions. However, I decided to commit to this approach in order to obtain a more objective view of how my interactions may result in certain perceptions in a work environment. This helped me to focus on my motivations and how I wanted to approach this stage of my career.

In the second phase, Jawaria helped me to create a coherent narrative that was reflected in a revision of my resume. She was very supportive as I overcame my hesitation to assert myself in more contemporary formats, such as LinkedIn. I felt that the conversations that we had were essential to feeling more confident as I moved forward to identifying positions that were of interest, researching the employers and writing customized cover letters to accentuate skill sets.

The third phase navigated the strange and often confusing experience of the interview process. Jawaria helped me to just accept the black box that is HR for many corporations and to then move forward to interviews with medical directors and company executives. She was present after every interview, to challenge and also to validate my perceptions of what transpired.

I have many supportive friends in medicine and other professions that offered insight and encouragement in my job hunt. But I feel that the investment in the professional coaching Jawaria offered was essential to creating the mindset necessary to approach and feel comfortable competing in the current non-clinical environment.

In the end, yes, I was able to get an offer for a job that I feel will be very interesting and challenging. And I am very grateful for Jawaria’s assistance in helping me in this process. She was very willing to share her own experiences as a physician and this was enormously meaningful.

There is a saying: “When the student is ready, the teacher will come”. This definitely applied to me and I felt that what she said resonated, even from our first conversation. As physicians, we invest into our profession, but there is something to be said for investing in ourselves as well. I would encourage my fellow doctors to consider how important professional mentorship can be and how often it can feel inaccessible. But if you are ready, then Jawaria can be the catalyst to empower physicians to feel energized about their career choices.